'저는 그들의 땅을 지키기 위하여 싸웠던 인디안들의 이야기를 기억합니다. 백인들이 그들의 신성한 숲에 도로를 만들기 위하여 나무들을 잘랐습니다. 매일밤 인디안들이 나가서 백인들이 만든 그 길을 해체하면 그 다음 날 백인들이 와서 도로를 다시 짓곤 했습니다. 한동안 그 것이 반복되었습니다. 그러던 어느날, 숲에서 가장 큰 나무가 백인들이 일할 동안 그들 머리 위로 떨어져 말과 마차들을 파괴하고 그들 중 몇몇을 죽였습니다. 그러자 백인들은 떠났고 결코 다시 오지 않았습니다….' (브루스 개그논)





For any updates on the struggle against the Jeju naval base, please go to savejejunow.org and facebook no naval base on Jeju. The facebook provides latest updates.

Wednesday, March 18, 2009

Text Fwd: Red Flag: US Air Force Trains For War With Russia, China


* Informed in StopNATO*

* Image source/caption*
same as the original article below

'Ethan Miller
An F-16C Fighting Falcon flies during a U.S. Air Force demonstration near Indian Springs, Nev. Getty Images'


http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=101975087
National Public Radio
March 17, 2009
At Red Flag, The Flying's Real, But The Enemy's Not
by Tom Bowman

The second of a two-part series

-The Cold War seems to be everywhere at this desert base; no matter that the
Soviet Union came to an end when Sullivan was 10 years old. Soviet and Cuban
flags hang in the briefing rooms, next to a large Russian air-to-air missile.
In the squadron's small bar, called a Heritage Room, bullet-riddled pieces of
Soviet planes hang on the wall. Even the bar stools are painted with Russian red
stars.

-[T]he U.S. has what's called air dominance — no country can match its
fighters and bombers, so American ground troops don't have to worry about being
killed from the sky.

So why is there such an emphasis on training fighter pilots?

-"As far as actual live combat, I'll believe that some of the last air-to-air
kills that the U.S. Air Force had was in Bosnia back in the 1990s."
-Without any real threats, Stevens and others talk of possible threats. Russia
is still cranking out top-notch fighter jets and not only flying them but
selling them to China. The Chinese are also building more sophisticated missiles
that could challenge the F-16.

Since the 1970s, fighter pilots have flocked to Nellis Air Force base on the
outskirts of Las Vegas for war games called Red Flag.

Today the jets they fly are faster and the weapons are more powerful and
precise. Something else has changed too: There's no enemy air force that can
challenge them in the skies, which raises the question of whether dogfights are
becoming a thing of the past.

Capt. Shane Sullivan steps outside the low sand-colored building that houses his
squadron, the 64th Aggressors. F-16s occasionally course through the sharp blue
sky, and he gestures toward a relic in the parking lot: a Soviet jet.

"So that signifies who we are," Sullivan says. "We tell people, 'Hey if you're
looking for the Aggressor Building, follow the MiG-21.' "

Sullivan's squadron plays the enemy in the training exercise. In their minds,
the only enemy worth playing these days is the Soviet Union.

Across the street sits an old armored vehicle.

"You can see it's tracked — it almost looks like a tank, except [for a] couple
of missiles onboard there," Sullivan says, explaining that the former Soviet
Union would have used those types of vehicles.

The Cold War seems to be everywhere at this desert base; no matter that the
Soviet Union came to an end when Sullivan was 10 years old. Soviet and Cuban
flags hang in the briefing rooms, next to a large Russian air-to-air missile.

In the squadron's small bar, called a Heritage Room, bullet-riddled pieces of
Soviet planes hang on the wall. Even the bar stools are painted with Russian red
stars.
....
"Beyond that range is actually where all the fighting happens," he says. "Where
all the training and the important stuff. Once we fly over those ranges, at that
point it's pretty much the fight's on."

The fight's on when Sullivan climbs into his F-16 Falcon. His job is to shoot
down — in a virtual way — the American pilots who come here to train,
jamming their radar, locking on to shoot a missile. On his uniform is the red
star patch of the enemy.

Dozens of fighter pilots assemble for a briefing in a large theater, answering
to their call signs. Nearly all are square-jawed young men. There are a few
women among them, and nearly everyone in the room has that fighter-pilot
swagger.

Honing Flight Skills

The Air Force created Red Flag just after the Vietnam War. Too many pilots were
getting shot down in Vietnam, and top officers said their skills were getting
rusty. The Air Force found that 10 training runs at Red Flag helped fix that
problem.

Lt. Col. Dan "Digger" Hawkins, the deputy commander at Red Flag, spreads out a
map of the training site, some 12,000 square miles of mountains, lakes and high
desert. It's roughly the size of Maryland.

"Typically in a mission you'll have about 40 to 60, maybe even 80 blue aircraft
players," Hawkins says. "They must be the friendly. The friendly forces. And
then about a dozen of what we call the "Red Players," the enemy aircraft that
are defending. They'll set up in the western part of the airspace here and
defend their targets on the west side."

He points out that the U.S. has what's called air dominance — no country can
match its fighters and bombers, so American ground troops don't have to worry
about being killed from the sky.

So why is there such an emphasis on training fighter pilots?

"None of us, I think, can really say with certainty who it is that we may end up
having to fight next or what their capabilities are or what weapons systems
they'll have," Hawkins says. "And so that's why we keep our skills honed with
exercises like Red Flag — so that we can be ready to defend the country at a
moment's notice against whoever it is who may try to attack us."

No one who is currently training at Red Flag has ever been in a dogfight, but
the training they receive is what Hawkins calls "very realistic dogfights."

"As far as actual live combat, I'll believe that some of the last air-to-air
kills that the U.S. Air Force had was in Bosnia back in the 1990s."

That was before these students were even pilots.

Capt. Brock Stevens, a 32-year-old weapons officer from Mountain Home Air Force
Base in Idaho, flies aboard an F-15 Strike Eagle, an Air Force fighter bomber.
What he faces in the skies above Nellis is like nothing he's seen in the real
world.

"It's the only time we've put this many planes airborne, and it's the only time
we've seen this big of a threat facing us," he says.

As Threat Changes, So Does Training

Without any real threats, Stevens and others talk of possible threats. Russia is
still cranking out top-notch fighter jets and not only flying them but selling
them to China. The Chinese are also building more sophisticated missiles that
could challenge the F-16.
....
"Our sister squadron at Mountain Home just got back from Afghanistan, and about
90 percent of their sorties over there were close air support," Stevens says.

So for the first time in its history, Red Flag has added an extra week of
training to focus on helping ground troops. Pilots practice striking suspected
roadside bomb emplacements or enemy vehicles.

From Cockpit To Control Room

But increasingly, the job of protecting ground troops falls to another attack
aircraft that sounds more like a lawn mower — a single drone, like the one
called a Reaper, which can carry up to 14 Hellfire missiles.

Just 45 minutes up the road, pilots sit inside a building at Creech Air Force
Base and tug at a joystick. They fly a Reaper 8,000 miles away in Afghanistan.
The pilot watches its progress on a computer screen.

Stevens has 10 friends flying drones, and he doesn't plan to join them.

"I mean the job they're doing is effective, but it's not like sitting in an
airplane flying. It's sitting on the ground at 1 G instead of actually being in
the fight," he says. "You'd rather drive a race car than a remote-control car."

But the Air Force isn't laughing at his joke — it's buying hundreds more
Reapers and just opened a new school to train these remote-control pilots.

So could a drone ever replace a fighter jet? That's doubtful, says Col. Eric
Matthewson, who oversees drone aircraft from the Pentagon.

"Reaper lacks the flexibility that a fighter would have," Matthew says,
referring to a plane's speed and maneuverability. Take a quick turn in a Reaper,
he says, and you would lose the satellite link. The computer screen would go
blank. And watching a computer screen, says Matthewson, is nothing like being in
the sky above a battlefield, where the pilot has a wide view of friend and foe
alike.

"The ability just to be able to look out your cockpit window and in a split
second take in the whole scene is something you just can't do in an unmanned
system today," he says.

So until the drone turns him into a relic, fighter pilots like Sullivan will
keep flying.


* Flight: Evolution Of Military Aviation By Andrew Prince

http://www.npr.org/news/graphics/2009/mar/flighttimeline/index.html

===========================
Stop NATO

No comments:

Post a Comment