'저는 그들의 땅을 지키기 위하여 싸웠던 인디안들의 이야기를 기억합니다. 백인들이 그들의 신성한 숲에 도로를 만들기 위하여 나무들을 잘랐습니다. 매일밤 인디안들이 나가서 백인들이 만든 그 길을 해체하면 그 다음 날 백인들이 와서 도로를 다시 짓곤 했습니다. 한동안 그 것이 반복되었습니다. 그러던 어느날, 숲에서 가장 큰 나무가 백인들이 일할 동안 그들 머리 위로 떨어져 말과 마차들을 파괴하고 그들 중 몇몇을 죽였습니다. 그러자 백인들은 떠났고 결코 다시 오지 않았습니다….' (브루스 개그논)





For any updates on the struggle against the Jeju naval base, please go to savejejunow.org and facebook no naval base on Jeju. The facebook provides latest updates.

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Site Fwd:[Hankyoreh] International investors request explanation from Samsung over occupational hazards allegations

[Hankyoreh 21]
International investors request explanation from Samsung over occupational hazards allegations

: Eight international investors have launched a joint inquiry, to which Samsung is expected to issue a formal response
Posted on : Jun.2,2010 14:29 KST


» Members of a civic organization in support of the human rights of workers in the semiconductor industry hold a signboard that mourns the death of Samsung Electronics' ex-employee Ms. Park Ji-hyeon in front of Samsung Headquarters in Seocho-dong, Seoul, April 2.



Institutional investors in Europe and the U.S. have asked Samsung for an explanation over allegations that workplace practices related to toxic chemicals at Samsung semi-conductor plants in South Korea have been the cause of increased fatal cancer rates among employees.

The Hankyoreh 21 exclusively obtained a letter issued by eight foreign investors including the All Pensions Group (APG) of the Netherlands, which was sent to Samsung Electronics President Choi Ji-seong on May 21. The investors requested that Samsung provide more information about occupational safety raised by Samsung‘s former employees.

The investors are a signatory of the Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) of the UN, which was established by former UN Secretary General Kofi Annan on April, 2006. It states that eco-friendliness, social responsibility and corporate governance should be considered as important factors for investment. About 700 institutional investors managing the 15 percent of the world’s invested capital have joined PRI.

They have broached six questions about the allegations of Samsung Electronics’ toxic chemicals. First, regarding Samsung’s plan to invite a third-party investigation team, they have requested more information about the timeline to implement this plan, the strategy on how to deal with its outcomes and to what degree Samsung would disclose the outcomes to its investors and/or to the public.

They also asked if Samsung currently has plans to deal with the ailing ex-employees including the provision of medical supports, training activities and presence of a whistle-blowing policy and effectiveness of governance regarding overall work place safety issues.

The death of former Samsung Electronics employee Hwang Yu-mi ignited the allegation of Samsung’s workplace safety. Hwang passed away from acute leukemia in March 2007 at the age of 23, after working in the third line at Samsung Electronics’ Giheung plant. Another employee Park Ji-hyeon, who fell ill with acute leukemia after working at Samsung Electronics’ Onyang plant, died on March 31, 2010. Samsung denied any link between cancer and the workplace conditions, however, by opening up the Giheung plant to the media on April 15. Samsung called the string of diseases “mere coincidence.”

The situation took a volatile turn when the Hankyoreh 21 published an internal Samsung semiconductor handbook describing a wide range of toxic chemicals used in the plant in an article entitled “Samsung Semiconductor Uses Six Types of ‘carcinogens’,” published May 21, 2010.

APG initially proposed a joint inquiry into the allegations about Samsung on April 30, saying, “Twenty-three former employees of Samsung Electronics have fallen ill with leukemia through April 22, and they have raised questions about occupational safety at Samsung Electronics plants.”

Initially, APG proposed that investors request Samsung disclose more information on the safety of the workplace, and eight international investors made the decision to support the proposal.

An APG official said other investors had already submitted respective requests to Samsung to explain the occupational safety allegations. The institutional investors that joined the joint inquiry plan will coordinate on the allegations through conference calls soon. Samsung is expected in turn to issue a formal response to the investors’ inquiries.

By Lim Ji-seon sun21@hani.co.kr

No comments:

Post a Comment