'저는 그들의 땅을 지키기 위하여 싸웠던 인디안들의 이야기를 기억합니다. 백인들이 그들의 신성한 숲에 도로를 만들기 위하여 나무들을 잘랐습니다. 매일밤 인디안들이 나가서 백인들이 만든 그 길을 해체하면 그 다음 날 백인들이 와서 도로를 다시 짓곤 했습니다. 한동안 그 것이 반복되었습니다. 그러던 어느날, 숲에서 가장 큰 나무가 백인들이 일할 동안 그들 머리 위로 떨어져 말과 마차들을 파괴하고 그들 중 몇몇을 죽였습니다. 그러자 백인들은 떠났고 결코 다시 오지 않았습니다….' (브루스 개그논)





For any updates on the struggle against the Jeju naval base, please go to savejejunow.org and facebook no naval base on Jeju. The facebook provides latest updates.

Monday, May 2, 2011

Text Fwd: Global Hawk purchase in trouble as U.S. price tag jumps twofold

http://english.hani.co.kr/arti/english_edition/e_national/475725.html
Hankyoreh
Global Hawk purchase in trouble as U.S. price tag jumps twofold
: A decline in demand due to U.S. defense budget cuts has been cited for the price hike
Posted on : Apr.30,2011 13:20 KST

By Lee Soon-hyuk

Following the South Korean government’s announcement of plans to hasten the introduction of the Global Hawk unmanned high-altitude surveillance aircraft in the wake of the Cheonan sinking and artillery attack on Yeonpyeong Island, the United States has reportedly raised its quote for the aircraft more than twofold.

While Seoul announced plans in March to move up the introduction of the Global Hawk in order to improve its North Korean intelligence gathering capabilities, the large increase in the price may generate controversy.

Military web journal Defense 21 reported Friday that the United States recently quoted a purchase price of $450 million for four Global Hawks and demanded an additional $350 million in development costs. Taking into account demands for the settlement of additional expenses at the time of delivery reflecting the rate of increase in consumer prices, the report added that the total purchase amount would be over one trillion won, more than twice the initially predicted amount, and that operation expenses are predicted to increase by 25 percent each year.

Defense 21 also reported the United States announced its intention to install an operation station at its military base in Guam with terrestrial reception station facilities in order to operate a surveillance and reconnaissance network linking unmanned surveillance aircraft and satellites.

The Global Hawk is an unmanned high-altitude aircraft capable of observing and photographing terrestrial facilities and movements even in the presence of clouds using state-of-the-art radar and optical and infrared sensors from an altitude of 20 kilometers. The top-level strategic spy satellite weapon, which over a 24-hour period is capable of generating thousands of detailed photographs in which a single point represents 30 square centimeters, has an operational radius of some 3,000 kilometers.

The reason cited for the sharp rise in the price of the Global Hawk was a decline in demand stemming from reductions in the U.S. defense budget.

According to a Bloomberg report, U.S. Secretary of the Air Force Michael Donley stated in a letter submitted to Congress on April 12 that the per-unit price for the Global Hawk would increase by more than 25 percent owing to a 14 percent drop in the number of orders. Northrop Grumman, the manufacturer of the aircraft, also said that a decision by Air Force authorities to reduce the number of new and improved Block 40 models scheduled for production through 2015 from 22 to 11 also had a major impact. Amid this situation, the effects of U.S. defense budget cuts spilled over onto the South Korean government’s plan to introduce the Global Hawk.

The South Korean government currently has concerns over the matting. It is awaiting a response to a letter of offer and acceptance (LOA) request submitted to the United States following its decision in the second half of 2010 to introduce the Global Hawk, citing the transfer of wartime operational control (OPCON) and strengthening its North Korea monitoring system.

It also made official its plans to hasten the introduction of next-generation stealth fighters and the Global Hawk with last month’s announcement of “National Defense Reform Plan 307.”

Regarding the controversy, an official of South Korea’s Defense Acquisition Program Administration (DAPA) said, “It has not been verified that the U.S. made such a proposal.”

“There should be an official response to the LOA request very soon, and we will handle the matter through transparent discussions at that time,” the official added.


Please direct questions or comments to [englishhani@hani.co.kr]

No comments:

Post a Comment